Innovation in design and inside a digital product is indeed wonderful. However, innovation is not necessary. It means that not only can it backfire, but can also overturn the company, the product and create negative vibes among users.

Expert app developers Toronto who have extensive experience in product development and management have decided to share with us the consequences of innovation going too far. What it looks like and some of the psychological impacts coming with the industry’s expectations and wrapping up with insights can help us all understand how to prevent innovation from going sour.

Innovation can have the clever disguise of a task which is like fixing the modern wheel. Yet, the drive that people feel when it comes to making apps a bit different for everyone is different than just fixing the modern wheel itself.

In a lot of cases, innovative ideas are often focusing on backend development or on the backend. Here, the prospective app owner comes up with their baseline for either some logic or a process that will solve a problem but haven’t necessarily thought about what the interface looks like. At times, the idea presented for an app is just a mere presentation and nothing else.

Most product development agencies and firms see both the above kinds of phenomenon along with in-between situations of the above. At times, innovation consists of novel apps that are destined to bring something fully unique to the world. At times, they spin existing formulas that are intended to do things better. They work when things work out greatly.

However, there are instances where some of those features, design elements, functionality and other aspects that once were innovative have now become common. Yes, the digital world has no boundaries. What was last year’s trendsetter is now today’s mainstream thing.

In terms of interfaces, can innovation backfire in that arena?

Today is the time of mobile devices (smartphones, tablets and the like). The modus operandi of them is obviously touch intensive and interfaces of most apps are touch heavy. Design patterns that emerged near menus, their layouts, along with icons that usually represent them have become concrete. The reason being is stringent user testing all over these years.

However, spinning on features, like menus, or doing something over the top, like changing the way users scroll through a site from one side to the other instead of top to bottom, can make sense for an innovative idea.

The truth is that these kinds of innovations and things need extensive testing. Why? Simple: If it does not go well with the testers and the audience for any kind of reason (slow navigation, sluggish working etc.) then it's not going to do well in the market. In short, no one wants a bland burger with rancid relish on their plate.

However, none of this should ever prevent anyone from letting their imagination become real. There are chances that such ideas can be real, worthwhile and truly worth the buck. That thing may be something the app needs. It can be accepted and embraced by the audience really nicely.

But if that innovation goes against the user experience, then it means that it has been overdone. Meaning such an innovation is not innovation at all. This is why extensive testing is always key.

Tips to prevent products from becoming over the top in the course of innovation

Imagination is never a problem as the great Albert Einstein once said Imagination is more important than knowledge. However, it should not hurt innovation in a way that it becomes bad for the product.

A lot of biases enter the arena of software development and it becomes a part of the battle of making the idea and the app stand out. Here are some tips that can help app development companies look before they take the leap of innovation in their quest for making a worthwhile app:

People appreciate simplicity and enjoy it more than anything

It might seem a bit strange but it is true. People enjoy simplicity a lot as it is the key to User Experience (UX) with everything. No app should be bogged down by animations, transitions and wrong placement of elements. Else it will frustrate users.

No need to meddle with it if it is broken 

Innovation does come from thinking out of the box, but priorities are a thing which should never be overlooked. Standardized UI elements along with native ones are easy to implement. Users are already familiar with them. If the app’s purpose is not about visual aesthetics then developers are on the right path.

No need to stop the research but taking a break is a must

It would be wise to stabilize the product. That way, there won’t be much need to innovate any further in it. It is wise to control the app development cost at all times.